New Reply[×]
Name
Email
Subject
Message
Files Max 8 files48.1MB total
Tegaki
Password
Flag
[New Reply]


Read the RULES before posting.

Remember to support your fellow 'Booleans

Gems Meta Art


Steppenwolf2.png U A
[Hide] (119KB, 1059x929) Reverse
Anthropilled books
d3e4605e913c898d4f0896edec34ccbb0b35b9d7533ab2e8309596712f0ca520.png U A
[Hide] (326.2KB, 488x488) Reverse
Replies: >>104014 >>106220
>>104010
Yup, it's resisting Trump time
Replies: >>104050 >>104444
>>104014
Ok small business
>>104000 (OP) 
Gemmy thread
>>104000 (OP) 
the "bottom for human men" stare:
Replies: >>105405
>>104000 (OP) 
Did you draw this? What a coincidence. Fuck.
aramisHoldingBreath.png U A
[Hide] (137.9KB, 989x823) Reverse
>>104014
You could say that's the time he desires.
Replies: >>104449
>>104444
why is he blushing idgi are you gay?
Replies: >>105415
>>104294
Kill yourself.
Replies: >>105414
>>105405
the "bottom for human men" response:
Replies: >>105421
>>104449
yes 💩 is gay
Replies: >>105433 >>105554
>>105414
Fuck you.
>>105415
Things only a Fool would say:
Replies: >>105553
>>105433
We're in the right place for it.
>>105415
 doodoooo fecexzs
Replies: >>105558
>>105554
You are mucho borracho brochacho ✌️
Replies: >>105559
>>105558
nacho tacol chilmigchanga :(()
Replies: >>105637
>>105559
:()
From A Farewell to Arms:
>“I always wanted to have a tail like that. Wouldn’t it be fun if we had brushes like a fox?”
What did Hemingway mean by this?
Replies: >>105658 >>105815
>>105654
Hemingway is 
1. a homosexual
2. in love with himself
3. just making shit up
Replies: >>105660
>>105658
confirmed furry, then
Replies: >>105662
>>105660
There are little hints of a lot of weird fetish stuff in a lot of his stories.  Even in the 1920s, among the expatriate American writers' community in Paris he was universally rumored to be a closet case doing a campy public I'm-so-tuff show of performative masculinity for all the world to see.  And those guys would have known.  The rumors only grew the rest of his life.  Writers and writer-adjacent people in the world of mid-20th-Century American literary fiction from Truman Capote to Zelda Fitzgerald described him as what we'd now call a lowkey femboy.  Both of them would have had reason to know.
Replies: >>105664 >>105666
>>105662
Bro what
Replies: >>105667
>>105662
reminds me of james joyce being into braps
>>105664
DID I STUTTER
>>105654
Would it not?
Replies: >>105850
>>105815
It would likely get in the way, realistically.
47b23c6a22877d59cba9dab03dc71d2ea43ee74910088d9ff1e3cc509b7f6662.jpg U A
[Hide] (53.5KB, 493x404) Reverse
>>104010
e2c3e7e144f5792f2f816ca30305a3517b5645551da411b2f740c9a23ff21fb4.png U A
[Hide] (1.1MB, 708x1000) Reverse
Maybe I can shill this book here. It's basically about a guy getting teleported to an alternate earth populated by anthropomorphic cats living in our equivalent of the 18th century. Conveniently he was carrying a laptop that has an encyclopedia saved on it, along with a handheld solar battery. He ends up becoming an important source of scientific knowledge and a political asset for the cat nation he got stranded in. The anthro cats share a lot of traits with their feral counterparts, and a large chunk of the story resolves around the protagonist adjusting to this alien society. There's plenty of suffering involved.

Note that there are a handful of scenes containing sex, but they're not very descriptive of it and I wouldn't call it straight-up smut. It's technically HMOFA, but it's very unlike every other HMOFA story out there. If you want some minor spoilers as to why: the cats are psychologically incapable of love. They don't have things such as marriage or even committed relationships. They don't have a concept of cucking either. And the main character will grapple with this.

Shouldn't be hard to find a pdf; there's even an epub of it on libgen. It's part of a trilogy, but I haven't read the other two yet.
Replies: >>107012
4f84adf7d2ff17bc21b4ee41b1037dfb0d8a4a2bc55d8b42602ddea51ea8d8c8.png U A
[Hide] (551.6KB, 975x975) Reverse
dfb09a717992a12c7dad248a3c7d95f05d1ed2c2f468c64db250a8c245e8558c.png U A
[Hide] (131.6KB, 793x781) Reverse
>>107004
I was starting to wonder if you were the author.

I have to ask, though.  As I haven't read it, I am trying to figure out what you mean by "psychologically incapable of love."  Do you mean they don't pair-bond? The Greeks spoke of agape (selfless unconditional love like what a mother feels for her child, like what the Christian theologians say God feels for His creations), eros (this term encompasses both romantic love and sexual attraction), and philos ("brotherly love" between good friends).  Do the anthro cats do none of these things?  Or some but not others?  Spoilers because SNCA.  Catposting because it seems appropriate.
Replies: >>107252
>>107012
It's mainly a lack of romantic love. They'll go into heat and mate on the spot purely out of instinct without developing a deeper relationship. Family structures don't really exist and kittens are brought up by only one parent or even by someone else. They're also very individualistic and so don't have a desire to form close friendships either, though without completely shunning each other. There's still a sort of tenderness between parent/guardian and kitten, they still desire to co-operate and form a society, but that's really the furthest they'll go. Basically, the author made house cats sapient and retained as much of their social behaviour as possible.
Replies: >>107319
d0ba30967ca61b685eb208ff2eab11bd900c87428ecf4e07910161ac4981f4ce.png U A
[Hide] (185KB, 637x900) Reverse
d1f27e3e4c1b344bc380f6979e31d4df09c2cc0f2df1f4146a192ed7092ba7cf.png U A
[Hide] (901.7KB, 579x1280) Reverse
01db07a98877696fce95bb5220e8774d676f28a924274e2128ea20ee1245d6d1.png U A
[Hide] (250KB, 615x1000) Reverse
9993caef786a1d8ac4c0c1350b7a2feaf973c1e99f78ef210c15b2bb7e4ae22f.png U A
[Hide] (336.5KB, 853x880) Reverse
>>107252
I see.  Well, some primates pair-bond and some don't.  Primates are mostly pretty social, with exceptions, and most of the exceptions are branches of the primate family that diverged from what became humans many millions of years back.  Felines generally tend to be solitary ambush hunters and stalkers, but domestic cats in urban areas where there is a high population density can congregate in "colonies" in which they demonstrate a great deal of very complex social behavior.  I assume this behavior is instinctive rather than learned, but I don't know whether the domestic cat's closest non-domesticated relatives would behave the same way in the same kind of environment, or whether the centuries of selective breeding at the hands of humans have altered their instincts that drastically.  On the face of it, it seems intuitive to me that pair-bonding would be favored by natural selection, as litters with both parents providing for them would be more likely to survive than those where the mother alone provides.  The fact that we don't see a lot of monogamous pair-bonding among mammals in nature tells me that my intuition must be wrong here.

I don't know how likely it is that a species of sapient cats with opposable thumbs would create a civilization much like our own.  It looks like the main limitations on the size of a feral cat "colony" are resources and shelter, rather than any kind of emergent complex behavior where the cats of an established colony cooperate to keep away outsiders.  Feral cats in colonies will groom one another, and sometimes mother cats that give birth near the same time in close proximity will cooperate to nurse one another's kittens, particularly if the mother cats are themselves litter-mates.  There are supposedly reports of multiple cats cooperating to hunt, but I can find no real details.  Beyond that it seems like any troop of baboons or pack of wolves cooperates vastly more efficiently and effectively on much larger scales, for longer periods of time.  For me this calls into question the likelihood of sapient cats to organize in anything like our concept of the nation-state.  Of course, on a certain level, every living thing is the enemy of every other living thing, and every group of living things is a competitor for resources needed by every other group of living things, and whichever group of sapient cat people first develops the capacity for such large-scale organization and cooperation is going to exterminate every other group very, very quickly, and thereafter every one that's still alive will be the descendants of the ones who came up with the concept and had the capacity to make it a reality.

It sounds like a not particularly pleasant world for humans.  Pity the poor bastard who got dropped into it.
Replies: >>107824
>>107319
I really enjoy this kind of attention of detail when worldbuilding an anthro society. The cats' desire for cooperation is mainly a matter of convenience. It's rather necessity than familial bonding that drives them to stick together. Almost like they're purely rationalistic in that regard.

But it's not exactly that they're emotionless either. The protagonist definitely doesn't have solitary personality, yet they treat him as they would treat one of their own. He voices his frustrations about this at multiple points in the story, and the cats do actually show that they are concerned for his well-being, but their way of thinking is so radically different from his that they have a difficult time fathoming why he feels so let down all the time. They're even outright shocked at times, especially at one pivotal moment when it all became too much for him to bear.

It's hard to conceive of a truly alien society. Inevitably, your own human thinking will get in the way.
Replies: >>108067
catgirl meido by soda uyu a3de358913d64d8e429f200785a787ef.jpg U A
[Hide] (152.5KB, 1200x1774) Reverse
UFO Princess Valkyrie.gif U A
[Hide] (362.8KB, 320x241) Reverse
catgirl by soda uyu 057b2ff21a86bb41c412e7e9849d4021.png U A
[Hide] (9.1MB, 2096x3151) Reverse
cybersecurty catgirl.webp U A
[Hide] (315KB, 520x779) Reverse
>>107824
Ah.  Thanks.

I say this as someone who has had cats, and who grew up with cats.  I am accustomed to thinking of them as very affectionate and playful and sometimes silly creatures, though I also know that on some level those labels are anthropomorphization.  On a chilly winter night the cat hops onto your bed and pokes you in the face until you let her get under the covers with you.  She purrs, because she's warm now, and she can warm her feet on you.  But on some level it feels like something more, like maybe she wouldn't do this with a stranger, like maybe she recognizes you as distinct from other humans and associates something with you beyond "provides food and cleans litter box."

At the same time, when you're a kid, the first time you see the cat kill and eat a bird, or a mouse, you realize that these are not little people in fur suits.  They're not human, and you could even call them alien.  And you realize that you're very lucky that the cat weighs eight pounds instead of a hundred and eighty pounds, because they're fast and sometimes unpredictable and not at all shy about using their claws when they're offended.  All the videos of cats chasing laser dots or staggering around with slices of cheese on their faces doesn't change this.

But they're still mammals, and--  Well.  Trying to predict or model the behavior of fictional or hypothetical feline-descended tool-using sophonts based on the behavior of housecats is a little like trying to predict human behavior, human nature, and human personalities based on observing lemurs and tarsiers, isn't it?  Still, the descriptions of the story makes it seem very depressing, and like a very unfortunate predicament for the human character, rather than an adventure.  I would still like to think that they'd purr, at least sometimes.
[New Reply]
34 replies | 15 files | 21 UIDs
Connecting...
Show Post Actions

Actions:

Captcha:

- news - rules - faq -
jschan 1.7.3