/anthro/ - Anthropomorphic

>>112179 (OP) 
is there any more of this comic?

A bit too feral for my tastes.

>>112179 (OP) 
Just bring home a beautiful kitsune instead and your parents won't judge anywhere near as harshly

>>112277
What if you like being alive and not robbed blind of life essence, gold, or whatever that particular kitsune wants?

>>112279
Fell for 'coon propaganda award

>>112281
A kitsune will never do anything for nothing, it wants something. And I’m smart enough to know it doesn’t want me, it wants something from me.

>>112283
What of a kitsune really does want you? Would you reject a kitsune that loves you out of prejudice?

>>112285
I mean I’ll take her if she could somehow prove it.

The word knot is problematic but a feral drawn in a seductive way with eyeliner, being someones fiance (that means that that person is sexually attracted to that feral), is completely ok.
Purrgem so fucking retarded

>>112295
I said it’s too feral look up a bit.

>>112295
i think its more of so about irony, it is obviously not done with the reason of being sexually tempting, it is not porn. another factor is that knot is inherently sexual, it was popularized by furfag communities when referring to dog dick because of its shape, purpose and such, it is being attracted to animal features. another reason is that the 'toss OP posted has at least some sort of funny  undertone in it, purr also said that it was too feral for his liking. So in reality, it's not really comparable when putting more than one thought in it, one is meant to be comical and the other one is more of so about sexual attraction to animals.

>>112297
texas yeehaw

>>112297
thanks chatgpt
>being attracted to animal features
If you are a furry, you do that. The difference being in this image it's just an animal that's not anthro in any way.

>>112299
shut up avericel

>>112298
actually thats norway

>>112299
>If you are a furry, you do that. The difference being in this image it's just an animal that's not anthro in any way.
marge? people are attracted to the design (body, personality, yadda yadda) rather than the animal features, i agree that the image itself is not anthro too but purrgem quite just said that he doesnt like feral and prefers anthro. when you mention knot you're mentioning the dick, the dog dick. i dont think seething over not being able to say dog dick without being seen as a zoofag is a good look on you

85c795a6afa2a9317c6fedb07ff4f485803cdf743f62aa31b250968a470832ab.gif U A
[Hide] (61.4KB, 150x150) Reverse

>>112295
both are problematic actually
you're acting kinda sus rn

>>112179 (OP) 
I do find this character attractive
I dont like feral and would not classify this character that way in my mind but i can see how its cutting it close
Is this something i should be concerned about
Should i seek psychiatric help or something

>>112305
I just ignore the seethe

>>112305
I’d self reflect. What is it about this character you find attractive? How does it correlate to everything else you find attractive?

>>112307
Mostly basic stuff. Shes drawn curvy obviously and looks very soft.
I kind of like that shes small mostly out of novelty, same feeling that id get if she was bigger than me i think. I like the idea of being able to hold her like that but again its reversable to me.
I imagine if she was standing up she'd have generally normal scaled down adult woman proportions, if exadurated. 
Most of the "animal" features i specifically like are concentrated in the face and even then anthros generally have very human faces in terms of proportions. 
Hers is very pretty and carries a sweet expression and seems excited to be with the guy so basic self insert shit.

I dont think im totally in the wrong here but everyone has blind spots and ive heard the horror stories of rancid people who think there completley fine so i think it good to get outside perspective when i can

17d146f692ed48b54dcf3af1be4109404f8de00dd30ae3536a32da3c0931abe0.jpeg U A
[Hide] (245.9KB, 1920x1080) Reverse

>>112308
I was kinda thinking if there was a line up of everything you found attractive would I see a pattern? Is this an outlier for whatever reason or is this the median? Like I’d say for me 4.0 is the hard limit and the OP picrel is a 4.5.

>>112303
>muh dog dick
You are sexually attracted to animal features stop moralfagging

>>112310
Kinda hard to tell because a big part of what im into is like woman body shape, chest n hips n legs n stuff, which arent really represented by this chart but id estimate my limit is about 3.5 which is also where id put picrel in my minds interpretation.

Id say its an outlier because the closest to this i might look for is like "shortstack" and even then not too often since its a hard one to get to look right imo. Ill mostly stumble on ones like picrel i like randomly.

I dont have a chart for this kinda thing lol. I could make one i guess. Might take a sek

>>112310
3 or 4 is ideal

>>112318
go back to /trash/

>>112318
Just have your anthros with human genitalia it isn’t hard.
>>112319
I say it’s somewhere in the 4 range. Knock out the breasts and there’s not much left. I do think she stands on two legs at least based on the clothing but it’s rather close to feral raccoon.

>>112331
>Knock out the breasts
typical purrgem...

Why do we want women to have dicks again?

>>112305
She has breasts on that pic, she's not feral at all, just very short and scrunged up.

thats an animal

1379281897053.png U A
[Hide] (512.6KB, 1600x1488) Reverse

A raccoons even feral anyway? They're kinda bipedal even irl.

>>112349
Yes dum dum because they’re an animal.

>>112349
@grok Give her gigantic macromastia breasts.

ClipboardImage(1).png U A
[Hide] (167.5KB, 493x385) Reverse

>>112369
weird ass nigga

>@grok Give her gigantic macromastia breasts.