>>113005
>Best case scenario it's still lying about the underlying thing you actually want, genetics that code for large breasts or ability to feed infants
Development of facial features and secondary sexual characteristics is also a function of environment and nutrition, the looksmaxxer cope is that any genetic degeneration from the aforementioned factors can be easily mitigated and reversed in no more than a couple of generations. And it is a correct cope.
This is retarded anyway because most people don't care about whether their children will inherit their mother's large breast genes, dominant or otherwise, and breast size has no relation to lactation volume or quality. This line of thinking could very easily be flipped on its head to claim that surgerymaxxing incels are leading womens' naturally eugenic selection instincts astray by inserting a few millimetres of hard material into their jawline, which is ruhdeculuhs.