>>136225
although i felt a bit sad, and had nightmares about being attacked by squirrels that night, i tried again today, but only managed to see 1 squirrel running, and even had it in my scope. but i chose not to take the shot because it was moving too fast. perhaps a shotgun would have come in handy. i slowly approached where i thought it ran up a tree, but it was long gone. the rest of the day was spent creeping around, tripping over shit, and sitting around, waiting for a single squirrel to show up. they weren't lying about wild squirrels being nothing like urban ones. although, i think the duck hunters were doing a holocaust or something, because there was nonstop constant gunfire in the distance. i wonder if that made the critters hide (except the birds, they did not give a single shit). that and wearing woodland dpm in autumn was probably not the smartest choice
i'll keep going after squirrels, but if i see any rabbits, they'll go in the pot too (i think i was getting ragebaited today by rabbits or something. i kept hearing scurrying in dense vegitation). one reason i wanted to start hunting squirrels was to see if i could stomach doing it, and a bigger animal like a deer would probably be more traumatizing
>In any case, the squirrel's death through your hands was likely faster and less painful than whatever else would have killed it in nature. As long as your hunting doesn't harm the local ecology, I see no harm in it.
i hope so. it was completely unresponsive when i found it, but i don't know how a leg shot would kill something that fast. though since squirrels don't have painkillers, hospice, or deathbed gatherings, it still was probably a better death. as for harming the local ecology, i would have to kill a lot more squirrels before that started happening. that and fluffers here leave so much trash in the woods. hunting is a white man's sport, act like a white man ffs
>>136246
>eotech
they look so good, but cost so damn much