>>9025
Okay admittedly I haven't really checked the rules of a website for their policies on imagery of pooping feral kids, always assuming that those who are into it know better than to bring their interests to light of public outside of spaces specifically designed for such things, which may explain not having witnessed a place being overrun by those.
Haven't seen them here, or them getting chased away from here either (aside from the Disaster Fox incident half a year back, which may or may not have been uncalled for; afaik the comic itself is sfw, though the artist does draw them weird-like, but he's Japanese and who knows how they think).
The one imageboard that allows all sorts of content that comes to mind has its share of people i don't likeerate spammers that fit the profile in the OP but even their posts are a minority among random banter and milder people i don't likeeracies.
I'd also raise e6 as an example, where getting a blacklist warning seems to be rare enough — and they seem to be very anal about their tags and blacklists too, because if I'm reading it right they have put a black mark on at least one 19th century drawing of kittens by Theophile Steinlen?
Either way, getting a pee warning when viewing an artist seems to be rare; maybe I'm just looking at the wrong (or right?) artists? You'd think a den of scum and villainy would have more feces
Then again, their "popular" page is mostly body horror and yet they have Averi as a persona non grata, so what do they know.
>>9024
Originally wrote "Slipknot" but that would have removed a layer of irony.
Read the