/b/ - Random

>>4942
Make it real.

2066bf928fd4743907a19cc20db228cb80f64d84a96fbe09cd1a226be2bd806a.mp4 U A
[Hide] (2.5MB, 512x768, 00:09)

Do we like Arctic fopses, 'foo frens?  This one seems kind of shy.

>>5248
Yes we do

oeoe.jpg U A
[Hide] (114.8KB, 768x768) Reverse

omgsisa my OC put through cheap and shitty AI looks so niceeeeee

>>5852
can i see the original

>>5884
do this

make her anthro pls

>>6887
Ew.

>>6887

>>6889
It's kino, thank you

>>6889
Looks more fursuity than anthro

>>6895
Don't look a gift horse in the mouth

>>6899
Clearly a husky and I was looking at her boobs

>>6889
Pretty!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvLQLELZw3I tl;dw Use a Chinese model for vibe-coding and it spreads your buttcheeks for the CCP.  I'm surprised it took them this long.  We will be seeing a lot more of this.  Oh, and 80%+ of LLMs posted on Huggingface "demonstrate unexpected behavior," by which I mean they have been found to contain undocumented surprises for the end user.

>>7171
If the choice is between sending everything you do through a CCP backdoor and sending everything you do through a silicon valley frontdoor, the former has an infinitely lower capacity to result in harm to you and your immediate surroundings.

>>7175
>didn't watch the video award
Deepseek doesn't just build apps that phone home.  It builds apps that are remotely accessible, with hardcoded credentials.  It's very, very brazen about it.

You shouldn't be vibe-coding at all, unless you know enough about coding to debug it and do a proper security review.  Using Deepseek to vibe-code is now known to be even worse, as it has all the other disadvantages of vibe-coding while also now being proven to behave like a malicious actor.

00007.jpg U A
[Hide] (1.3MB, 2160x3552) Reverse

>>6887
Here's a very quick shoddy attempt.

>>7295
I like the result.

>>7484
*slop* *slop* *slop* *slop* *slop* *slop* *slop* *slop* *slop* *slop*

>clicks on the slop thread
>"My word! There's SLOP here!"
Do nyaggas really?

>>7497
thought it was a joke about the noise they'd make

>>7499
yeah it seemed pretty obvious to me

85 Sem Título_20250704170627.jpg U A
[Hide] (86.8KB, 437x539) Reverse

murrica.jpg U A
[Hide] (427.5KB, 768x1152) Reverse

had some fun with the redraw tool thing

>>7887
Lol @ the pentagram necklace

>>7887
Why do I find this attractive?

>>7888
A pentagram is a special message delivered from the Pentagon, right?
>>7891
...the one on the left or the one on the right?

>>7892
Both :)

>>8564
holy shit holy fucking shit why can't they just make ts real already???

>>8564
is this real?

>>8566
yes she lives in lousiana

>>8564
Generation really broke down around the feet.

>>8564
@Furry Shitcoins GTFIH
>>8569
yeah lol her right leg is passable but the left just vanishes, which I told myself must be because it's behind the fabric, but no she'd be falling over if that were the case.

It's not really image related, as such, but it has to do with AI. Has anyone here used an LLM for coding or engineering? I have been trying to design stuff in CAD. As I have zero training or background in it, I have been pestering G**gle's "AI mode" to generate SCAD code which I then copy and paste into OpenSCAD for sanity checks and refinement.  Sometimes I get something almost perfect really quickly. Sometimes I go back and forth with it for hours until I ragequit.  I am inclined to assume anything small enough to run locally is going to be even less capable, but what do I know?

>just lrn2SCAD script

My brother in Christ, where do I even find a class for that?

>just lrn2OpenCAD

There are classes for that. It takes years to learn.

>just git gud

😔

>>8583
I'm not familiar with SCAD or CAD, but have you tried ChatGPT? It seems to be pretty good at niche things like this so long as there is documentation online. Or you can feed it the documentation manually.

ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (19.9KB, 474x247) Reverse

>>8584
Tried it. Firefox has a feature I just discovered in which you can "ask ChatGPT" and it opens a narrow panel in the left side of the browser.  No signup, no account, no login. But it kept telling me I had to "click the upload button" to send it the existing code, 'cos copying and pasting strips some formatting. I don't know whether that is actually factual but that is what it said. And there's no "upload files" button in the in-browser interface.

>>8583
Only played around with google's ai because it doesn't require a phone number for anything more or less advanced. It does okay regurgitating whatever it has picked up from stackoverflow and the like. Been able to make a couple small with just the kind of functionality and ux as requested. Both had to be prompted within the same session; feeding it code and so much as asking it to add a placeholder button that doesn't even do anything tended to result in it rewriting the entire thing even when told not to touch anything else. 
It's also capable of parsing and creating vectors so that can't be too different from CAD right?
As far as using AI for coding is concerned, Claude is considered to be the most capable for the task.

Wouldn't expect locally hosted LLMs to fare any better than ChatGPT/Claude/Deepseek etc. There is too much money involved. 
Tried hosting one a year ago and it was surprisingly lucid but nowhere near what the commercial models are apparently cable of. Open source models have surely advanced since then, but so have the commercial ones.

>>8585
Oh, are you avoiding it because you don't want to sign up? There's also duck.ai which is some sort of proxy and might work better than the sidebar you're mentioning at least. It's run by DuckDuckGo and-- supposedly-- nothing you send through it is used for model training or saved but I wouldn't trust that. These services are all free and the data is just too juicy to resist, I'm sure. You're paying with training data, which I think is fair but, you know, just keep that in mind. Don't go telling it that your name is John Doe and you live at 123 Main St. and would like to write a script to automate illegal firearms manufacturing or whatever.

ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (31.1KB, 600x419) Reverse

>>8587
>>8587
>a script to automate illegal firearms manufacturing

>>8588
I will answer semi-seriously and select my words with due care.

In the US, at least, you can build stuff for yourself, so long as you color within certain legal lines. You can't sell it. You have to do all the machining yourself, no sending blueprints to a machine shop labeled "hinge bushing." It can't be a commercial enterprise. There is an idea I have for a .22 target pistol with a receiver made from a length of 1" OD, 3/4" ID, seamless aluminum tubing. It would be based on a very well known design, but lighter, with some little details altered, like instead of the dovetail cut in front of the hole for the bolt stop pin, there'd be a flat milled on that surface at that location to mount a red dot sight, and so forth. That plus a skinny contour barrel would take about 12oz off the weight, according to my estimates. It still wouldn't be the lightest or most compact .22 but it'd be different, at least, and the idea appeals to me.

But what I have in mind with the idea of vibe-coding for OpenSCAD is an optical sight mount for an existing firearm. It does not, so far as I can determine, have any legal >implications whatsoever, at least in the US.

>>8591
geg. I almost guessed it. I wonder if that freaked you out at least a little bit. You're the one who asked something related in the dailylogging thread was it?

>>8592
I've inquired elsewhere, yes.

I just spent an hour with Qwen 3.6 installed locally and despite the hype it is, shall we say, not good at this kind of thing at all, only instead of taking a second and a half to grind out code that doesn't work, it takes an hour and forty-five minutes.

>>8593
Yeah, I wouldn't put none too much hope in anything which is capable of running on your computer for this sort of task.

ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (270.5KB, 1920x1080) Reverse

>>8594
Google's AI generates code quickly, but I get stuff like this over and over until I ragequit.  I know, I'm lazy.  I know, I should find a college somewhere and take courses to learn SCAD, or OpenCAD, or whatever, to do this myself.  Sometimes I think it'd be faster.

I can see the part in my head.  I have the dimensions.  I have already drawn cross sections and profiles in Paint, or at least a Linux clone of Paint.  I know exactly what I want it to look like.  I keep typing this stuff in and copying and pasting my diagrams. The AI keeps going "hurr durr ner ner ner ner, we goin' bowlin'," beating on the buttons with its virtual dick, and puking out nonsense like this.

All of this is pretty pointless, really.  I'm not a machinist.  I don't know any machinists.  Around here there are machine shops but nobody will return your calls if it isn't about a contract to make fifty million widgets for General Motors.  All I'd be able to do would be to rotate the 3D rendering on the screen and admire my own cleverness.

>3D print

Plastic is unsuited for this.  It would need to be metal.  If I could get a usable SCAD file that describes it, there are tools that would export it as a .step file for CNC machining.  Nobody around here has time for one-offs for hobbyists, though.

>>8615
Is machining equipment that expensive?
I wish I could help more but I have zero familiarity with SCAD. I've worked with Rhino before, though, and looking at the code in the lefthand side of your image, it looks like you're just defining extrusions, voids, curves, etc. It doesn't look terribly complicated. Can't you just study what the AI is outputting and amend it yourself? Are there really no good tutorials on YouTube on the language? Worst case scenario, I'd study the official standard.
Why aren't you trying ChatGPT directly? Is it because of the account registration? This seems like something it could do easily. Though I suppose I don't think any AIs currently are good at complex spatial understanding. If I were doing this, I'd break it down into smaller parts which I can reasonably expect ChatGPT to handle just fine. For example: "Write SCAD code that models a rectangular prism of XYZ dimensions, then extrude a cylinder of ZYX dimensions voiding it down the center, etc." then I'd fix it up manually. idk.
>I know, I should find a college somewhere and take courses to learn SCAD, or OpenCAD, or whatever, to do this myself.
college ☠️

42cde5465f5b2e0f1987c626416171029b7ebdff08cbd1eaf486bfcf65f30acc.jpg U A
[Hide] (17.5KB, 640x640) Reverse

>>8618
>machining equipment
Well into four figures for used desktop hobbyist stuff, if you are talking about something that can do work in metal and not just wood and plastic.

>ChatGPT

I am unwilling to make accounts and doxx myself to use "free" stuff.  There is a no-registration "talk to GPT" tool in more current versions of Firefox.  There was briefly a no-login, no-registration version, but it was pretty gimped and I frequently caught it giving outright false information.  Now everything is "login to continue," "choose a payment plan," etc.  And no, we're not going there.

Maybe I'm too old to learn this stuff.  I don't understand what I'm reading.  I look at it and I see the word "translate" and vast blobs of what I think must be variables, and I am utterly unable to figure out from looking at it what does what, despite the comment lines the AI has added.  I can only look at the 3D model it generates and shake my head.  Screenshot, paste to AI, say "this is wrong," AI is very unctuously and creepily apologetic, generates more stuff that's even worse, lather, rinse, repeat until I have to turn off the computer and go touch grass.

Pic unrelated.

>>8625
Do you really need a metal printer? Why not just mold and cast? Even stamping, it's easier