/b/ - Random

Quality is not guaranteed


New Reply[×]
Sage
Subject
Message
Files Max 8 files48.1MB total
Tegaki
Password
[New Reply]

Read the RULES before posting.
[Index] [Catalog] [Archive] [Banners] [Logs] [Archive]
No.581 [Reply] [Watch] [View the full thread]
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (968.8KB, 1422x773) Reverse
I play around with AIslop, specifically Stable Diffusion.  I have attempted to make a LoRA file for a certain focks character.

I am dissatisfied with the results, to put it mildly.  You might even recognize her. 

I am using Automatic1111 and Stable Diffusion 1.5.  I trained the LoRA file with kohya_ss.  Source images came from the places you'd expect.

I have access to SwarmUI with SDXL, Flux DEV, and 3.5 available on the back end, but I don't know whether any of the tools I have can make a LoRA for any of those.  And the quality of what I get from them is very disappointing, given how much newer they are than 1.5.

Does anyone else around here mess around with image generation?
Replies: >>585 >>673 >>743
No.4658 [Reply]
22ac2f8d-6180-48b8-951b-4cfb6d46275c.jpg U A
[Hide] (215.6KB, 1248x832) Reverse
>>>4632
>Nicely done. What tools did you use?
Since my PC is ancient and can't handle making ai stuff locally I use online tools. In the past I was using civit.ai but since now it prohibits "NSFW" stuff to free accounts I use chatgpt and grok for image-to-image stuff and these ones for text-to-image stuff:
https://pixai.art/en/generator/image
https://perchance.org/ai-text-to-image-generator

By the way do you have twitter or discord?
Replies: >>4667
No.4659 [Reply]
trolling2.png U A
[Hide] (782.8KB, 1024x1024) Reverse
No.4660 [Reply]
ede638fc-8bd0-4a9b-b696-f507d77134a8a.jpg U A
[Hide] (348.3KB, 848x791) Reverse
No.4661 [Reply] 
>>1526
I like this one
No.4667 [Reply]
427b5393583a3ea9270c3dda19ab746b0e96be1cd270241cc051593d73e0fc4e.png U A
[Hide] (643.5KB, 512x768) Reverse
>>4658
Thanks.
>twitter or discord?
No.  I don't use social media.  I prefer antisocial media.
Replies: >>4668
No.4668 [Reply] 
>>4667
Oh, damn. That's nice.
No.4784 [Reply]
catgirl test doodle.png U A
[Hide] (6.1KB, 512x512) Reverse
After many tries I finally got Framepack installed.  I am not sure what I expected, but it wasn't this.  This post has the quick doodle I put into it.  Prompt was "The catgirl dances gracefully, with clear movements, full of charm."
Replies: >>4785
No.4785 [Reply]
catgirl test video.mp4 U A
[Hide] (1.1MB, 608x640, 00:04)
>>4784
And this is what it made over the course of several minutes.
Replies: >>4786
No.4786 [Reply] 
>>4785
The arm movements are interesting, the pace of them. The most potential that I see in generative AI [as a medium for human expression, and cheap novelty in general] is image prompting/better prompt interpretation like we have now combined with the abstract results of 2022-3 models.
Replies: >>4795
No.4795 [Reply]
414000c784a0d6b3fbc3e4db47d5ac13e1fc0deabfd5ba29f31854fccdc4ade8.mp4 U A
[Hide] (877.6KB, 512x768, 00:04)
>>4786
There is a certain similarity to the way the animations come out, yes.  Asking for anything much longer or more involved than this tends to result in characters rotating their heads three hundred and sixty degrees.  It's cute, though.
No.4796 [Reply]
1bb3e8a680e8601d90cd920eb2d709a7eae32a53dc5200912a909b4e6a9dc587.mp4 U A
[Hide] (2.2MB, 512x768, 00:04)
Sometimes the animations just come out cursed, even short and simple ones.  I should stop spamming, though.

The thing about generating video is, it takes a long time.  It's not like image generation where you can do big batches and sort through them for nice ones.  The time it takes even for a five-second video makes that prohibitive.
No.4837 [Reply]
test foxxo 04.mp4 U A
[Hide] (6.1MB, 512x768, 00:12)
Well, maybe one more.

I genned an image of this lady foxxo at Perchance, using the "furry game cinematic" + "retro pulp art" models to get a still image I liked, and had FramePack work on it.  Isn't she a pretty foxxo lady?
No.4896 [Reply]
195cfdc3b21acadc8704c56877e3a465c4620eb42623ebc7deb717afa0fe8589.jpg U A
[Hide] (312.2KB, 912x1136) Reverse
Replies: >>4897 >>4898
No.4897 [Reply] 
>>4896
this looks like shit
No.4898 [Reply] 
>>4896
Wow
No.4902 [Reply] 
I like sparkledogs as much as the next guy, but

1. not anthro
2. are we sure that's not a guy?
Replies: >>4912
No.4912 [Reply]
903cb7cb-63aa-47a2-b52c-6a0f8e4c3800.jpg U A
[Hide] (229.3KB, 912x1136) Reverse
>>4902
Overlord Grok has noted your concerns.
No.4925 [Reply] 
>>4924
you look like shit
Replies: >>4929
No.4929 [Reply] 
>>4925
BOOM ROASTED
No.4940 [Reply]
Spoiler File U A
(401.2KB, 512x768) Reverse
I don't know if she counts as anthro probably not, that's why the spoilers, but this is Lelith Hesperax as a Disney princess.

"Oh, I'm falling in love with Commissar Fuklaw
He's the angriest mon-keigh that ever Druhkhari saw
But there's something about him
Yes, there's something about him..."
No.4942 [Reply]
game that isnt real.jpg U A
[Hide] (304.1KB, 1360x768) Reverse
Replies: >>4944
No.4944 [Reply] 
>>4942
Make it real.
No.5248 [Reply]
2066bf928fd4743907a19cc20db228cb80f64d84a96fbe09cd1a226be2bd806a.mp4 U A
[Hide] (2.5MB, 512x768, 00:09)
Do we like Arctic fopses, 'foo frens?  This one seems kind of shy.
Replies: >>5298
No.5298 [Reply] 
>>5248
Yes we do
No.5852 [Reply]
oeoe.jpg U A
[Hide] (114.8KB, 768x768) Reverse
omgsisa my OC put through cheap and shitty AI looks so niceeeeee
Replies: >>5884
No.5884 [Reply] 
>>5852
can i see the original
Replies: >>5885
No.5885 [Reply] 
>>5884
do this
No.6887 [Reply]
Spoiler File U A
(1.8MB, 1080x1779) Reverse
make her anthro pls
Replies: >>6888 >>6889 >>7295
No.6888 [Reply] 
>>6887
Ew.
No.6889 [Reply]
Spoiler File U A
(370.6KB, 784x1312) Reverse
>>6887
Replies: >>6894 >>6895 >>6919
No.6894 [Reply] 
>>6889
It's kino, thank you
No.6895 [Reply] 
>>6889
Looks more fursuity than anthro
Replies: >>6899
No.6899 [Reply] 
>>6895
Don't look a gift horse in the mouth
Replies: >>6900
No.6900 [Reply] 
>>6899
Clearly a husky and I was looking at her boobs
No.6919 [Reply] 
>>6889
Pretty!
No.7171 [Reply] 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvLQLELZw3I tl;dw Use a Chinese model for vibe-coding and it spreads your buttcheeks for the CCP.  I'm surprised it took them this long.  We will be seeing a lot more of this.  Oh, and 80%+ of LLMs posted on Huggingface "demonstrate unexpected behavior," by which I mean they have been found to contain undocumented surprises for the end user.
Replies: >>7175
No.7175 [Reply] 
>>7171
If the choice is between sending everything you do through a CCP backdoor and sending everything you do through a silicon valley frontdoor, the former has an infinitely lower capacity to result in harm to you and your immediate surroundings.
Replies: >>7181
No.7181 [Reply] 
>>7175
>didn't watch the video award
Deepseek doesn't just build apps that phone home.  It builds apps that are remotely accessible, with hardcoded credentials.  It's very, very brazen about it.

You shouldn't be vibe-coding at all, unless you know enough about coding to debug it and do a proper security review.  Using Deepseek to vibe-code is now known to be even worse, as it has all the other disadvantages of vibe-coding while also now being proven to behave like a malicious actor.
No.7295 [Reply]
00007.jpg U A
[Hide] (1.3MB, 2160x3552) Reverse
>>6887
Here's a very quick shoddy attempt.
Replies: >>7322
No.7322 [Reply] 
>>7295
I like the result.
No.7484 [Reply]
Spoiler File U A
(2.4MB, 1408x768) Reverse
Replies: >>7496
No.7496 [Reply] 
>>7484
*slop* *slop* *slop* *slop* *slop* *slop* *slop* *slop* *slop* *slop*
No.7497 [Reply] 
>clicks on the slop thread
>"My word! There's SLOP here!"
Do nyaggas really?
Replies: >>7499
No.7499 [Reply] 
>>7497
thought it was a joke about the noise they'd make
Replies: >>7500
No.7500 [Reply] 
>>7499
yeah it seemed pretty obvious to me
No.7887 [Reply]
85 Sem Título_20250704170627.jpg U A
[Hide] (86.8KB, 437x539) Reverse
murrica.jpg U A
[Hide] (427.5KB, 768x1152) Reverse
had some fun with the redraw tool thing
Replies: >>7888 >>7891
No.7888 [Reply] 
>>7887
Lol @ the pentagram necklace
Replies: >>7892
No.7891 [Reply] 
>>7887
Why do I find this attractive?
Replies: >>7892
No.7892 [Reply] 
>>7888
A pentagram is a special message delivered from the Pentagon, right?
>>7891
...the one on the left or the one on the right?
Replies: >>7893
No.7893 [Reply] 
>>7892
Both :)
[New Reply]
[Index] [Catalog] [Archive] [Banners] [Logs] [Archive]
234 replies | 93 files
Connecting...
Show Post Actions

Actions:

Captcha:

- news - rules - faq -
jschan 1.7.3