>>117556
>>117609
i think that on arguments which has sides that can be categorized as old vs new, the old side will always have more idiots that drag down the average by virtue of the fact that people who cant understand the a subject tend to find answers in fallacies and that an appeal to novelty will never be as comforting as an appeal to tradition to most idiots
constantly needing to resort to classifying everything as right/left makes you one of these tradition/novelty idiots