/anthro/ - Anthropomorphic

Anthros


New Reply[×]
Name
Email
Subject
Message
Files Max 8 files48.1MB total
Tegaki
Password
Flag
[New Reply]

Banner
Read the RULES before posting.
Movie night at >>122860

Remember to support your fellow 'Booleans!
Gems Meta Art
Magma
[Index] [Catalog] [Archive] [Banners] [Logs] [Archive]
## Admin c81af8 No.115409 [Reply] [Watch] [View the full thread]
f4f0bfbc236d9e0fa3faba825161c520ec218f7226cb6086fe9b6605373a8e28.png U A
[Hide] (194.4KB, 736x810) Reverse
Welcome to anthro.boo. This is the new thread to discuss website meta affairs. Remember to have fun and to not take things  personally.

Asset Guide
- Banners are 3:1 ratio with minimum 300x100 PNGs, if your banner is larger than 300x100 upload the original so we can correctly scale it down
- Flags are 26x18 pixel PNGs
- Emojis are 32x32 transparent PNGs, if it is not pixel art upload the original image so that we can correctly scale it down

for more specific questions, contact [email protected]
Last edited by admin
Replies: >>115691
bca4ff No.120327 [Reply] 
>>120323
Please don't say that, you might start another panic. Jeez, fronge you need a proper PR filter or something.
b8d813 No.120386 [Reply] 
lackeyer
!fSH2DiNc6U 0b1e91 No.120479 [Reply] 
>>120323
Why and when?
Replies: >>120483
35002d No.120483 [Reply] 
>>120479
He’s referring to this thread >>120089 where frog doom posted. Don’t think it’s shutting down soon doe.
7981f2 No.120502 [Reply] 
To reiterate my question, why does the soy board still exist
Replies: >>120505 >>120508
5de052 No.120505 [Reply] 
>>120502
>>119904
Replies: >>120510
35002d No.120508 [Reply] 
>>120502
I think it’s our /trash/.
f8ec99 No.120510 [Reply] 
>>120505
Is it THAT pressing of an issue. It's not even used
Replies: >>120511 >>120512
a97c21 No.120511 [Reply] 
>>120510
No, but 4cuckoldgiraffes like to sneed at the problematic unwholesome soiboi woahjacks because they're LE BAD because... um... b-because they just are... OK??!?
8e737a No.120512 [Reply] 
>>120510
Imma stop using this site right now if that board isn't delete
Replies: >>120513
40272e No.120513 [Reply]
what-black-woman.gif U A
[Hide] (1MB, 400x224) Reverse
>>120512
ea7a0f No.120772 [Reply] 
We should have a Photoshop Phriday
Replies: >>120773 >>120783
b0a54e No.120773 [Reply] 
>>120772
You sell photos?
88db87 No.120783 [Reply] 
>>120772
We could barter. I am willing to trade a random photo from Hiroshima (never forget) for a random photo of an animal (preferably a fox).
62be40 No.120946 [Reply] 
>>120940
@frooooooooog pls pls pls pretty please nuke most of the word filters
it's just not fun to see posts get fluffed up and have their meanings get changed
really isn't
e2311d No.121214 [Reply] 
Add the Israeli flag to the random flag pool
Replies: >>121219
fd53a1 No.121219 [Reply] 
>>121214
I've heard this before
4f36a0 No.121780 [Reply] 
Why was VikingTiger banned? I feel excessive unpaid force was used.
Replies: >>121789 >>121821 >>121844
ea9985 No.121789 [Reply] 
>>121780
i figure it's because he's a retard who drags around retarded drama and other retards to obsess over it everywhere he goes
Replies: >>121793
11779b No.121793 [Reply] 
>>121789
How so? I've never seen him bring up anything relating to this offsite drama unprovoked. It's always someone else who attacks him first. It's only natural for him to attempt to defend himself as he did in the supposedly offending post (>>121745). I'm not aware of any writ having been issued to him to cease this, so banning him so suddenly seems entirely unjustified and excessive when a simple warning and deletion would've done.
fd53a1 No.121821 [Reply] 
>>121780
on another site i think he was banned for being an offsiter i don't remember the entire thing but apparently he was in a Discovery Channel server with some pedophile
7e1247 No.121827 [Reply] 
To any concerned reader the above posts are not serious and shouldbot he takej seriously.
fd53a1 No.121840 [Reply] 
To any concerned reader the above posts are serious and should be taken seriously because the internet is serious business.
21b2b4 No.121844 [Reply] 
>>121780
It didn’t look like a serious ban to me.
Replies: >>121857 >>121861
b05bf7 No.121857 [Reply] 
>>121844
So it wasn't. Good.
fd53a1 No.121861 [Reply] 
>>121844
Buddy EVERYTHING on the internet is serious business there is no "unserious" here, We're all 100% serious with our posts.
Replies: >>121903
3c7040 No.121903 [Reply]
0540a5d92be63cf847e615a1e78d2831e87a88184aa3b6cb3031d1825b7c6477.png U A
[Hide] (33.9KB, 658x460) Reverse
>>121861
t.
Replies: >>121909 >>121914
3d1f7e No.121909 [Reply] 
>>121903
that's fkn red
fd53a1 No.121914 [Reply] 
>>121903
yes
09c352 No.122108 [Reply] 
the xitter and youtube links do not work on the front page
Replies: >>122128
470c74 No.122128 [Reply] 
>>122108
>xhe clicked the xitter and youtube links
go back(tm)
29df50 No.122866 [Reply] 
What happened ?
Replies: >>122867 >>122868 >>122873 >>122903
881a90 No.122867 [Reply] 
>>122866
Somebody set up us the bomb.
Replies: >>122876
dbab80 No.122868 [Reply] 
>>122866
You'll have to be more specific
Replies: >>122869
881a90 No.122869 [Reply] 
>>122868
He knows things only some people know about.  But he can't tell you.
Replies: >>122870
dbab80 No.122870 [Reply] 
>>122869
I'm a grower not a knower
91b65f No.122873 [Reply]
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (41.5KB, 660x223) Reverse
>>122866
>Another critic silenced.
Great to see. Meanwhile the cronic porn posters are never censored btw. (just check the logs)
If all the civil callouts are restricted then its time for more radical measures.
Expect the unexpected.
Replies: >>122877 >>122878
88db87 No.122876 [Reply]
020120678aec87fc93c226230b35853f0fa055142b8f70ffa036903e371ba148.jpg U A
[Hide] (245.1KB, 1920x1920) Reverse
>>122867
Main screen turn on.
8e737a No.122877 [Reply]
af07c39aa66600bc66f1429e6d1ca8b3e47a9b49f347804c2893dd422db03962.jpg U A
[Hide] (235.2KB, 900x1400) Reverse
>>122873
get a job nyagger
1e5287 No.122878 [Reply] 
>>122873
What the deleted post from 18 hours ago?
Replies: >>122879
b95574 No.122879 [Reply] 
>>122878
Were those the /pol/ nyagger's posts?
Well, he does consistently post non-anthro shit on /anthro/ so I suppose it's deserved and I certainly won't miss him. But, at the same time, if we're being strict with the rules (which I think we should strive to): there is technically no rule against off-topic posts.
To the lackeyposter's credit, he contains his non-anthro shite to /b/, at least, and has not technically broken anything listed under Rule 2.
I wouldn't miss either, but I can see why one was banned and not the other. Assuming that's even what happened to begin with.
Replies: >>122882 >>122889
29f091 No.122882 [Reply] 
>>122879
Doing a months-long spamming campaign should be a bannable offense

And no, the /b/ poster DOESN'T contain their slop to /b/ >>122856
Replies: >>122887 >>122889 >>122892
88db87 No.122887 [Reply]
0f6c3bf98ac21e38d8f320ff4ae9155059b463ef2fbb6d2ed31f2431c2715be2.png U A
[Hide] (500.4KB, 987x766) Reverse
>>122882
>no tail
6c2ba3 No.122889 [Reply]
Spoiler File U A
(9.6MB, 640x360) Reverse
>>122879
>>122882
>/pol/ nigga
I certainly don’t really care about him that much either, though I would kinda miss him.
>/b/ gooner
‘Gonna stay here for a lot longer, if you don’t like that then you can shill your ass back to the ‘https://linkedin.com for all I care about
Replies: >>122893
b95574 No.122892 [Reply] 
>>122882
That's a reply. There are plenty of non-anthro posts on /anthro/ as replies (eg. reaction images). I would argue it breaks Rule 2, however, which reads "You will not post NSFW content, including but not limited to..." since I'd certainly not like to be caught watching that in a typical work environment. There are two problems, though: (1) "NSFW" is poorly defined and (2) that part of the rule isn't really enforced at all to begin with. Those two krauts, for example, frequently make grotesque posts (which are anthros, at least) which I'd also categorize as NSFW and thus as rulebreaking, but nobody's enforcing that.
>Doing a months-long spamming campaign should be a bannable offense
I agree with you, but I'm just pointing out that, as they stand, technically no rules were violated... which is to say that they should probably be amended.
cc130b No.122893 [Reply] 
>>122889
/anthro/ is quality controlled /b/ you just need to follow the rules as listed.
Replies: >>122894
b95574 No.122894 [Reply] 
>>122893
He has.
Replies: >>122896
1e5287 No.122896 [Reply] 
>>122894
Are his /b/ posts being deleted?
Replies: >>122897
b95574 No.122897 [Reply] 
>>122896
None of his posts have been deleted or touched at all that I know of, no, if you're referring to the pornposter.
79a76f No.122903 [Reply] 
>>122866
i think it was the guy who would post namefag drama whenever VikingTiger was around
[New Reply]
[Index] [Catalog] [Archive] [Banners] [Logs] [Archive]
281 replies | 48 files | 37 UIDs
Connecting...
Show Post Actions

Actions:

Captcha:

- news - rules - faq -
jschan 1.7.3